|
|
Topics: 5
Replies: 28
Post: #44248
PT: #1/3
|
This message was edited by ManchesterUntd. on February 26th, 2011 04:29 GMT
Just curious if anyone out in forum land can tell me why the Sporting 91B team was so highly recruited and the Sporting 92B team was not. Is it the coach? Is it the contacts the coach has? Were the 91B players more recruitable? Is it that more college scouts are looking at academy players rather than club players?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Topics: 14
Replies: 1149
Post: #44272
PT: #2/3
|
I don't know for sure but 2 things I would guess: 1. the 91B coach was the stanford men's assistant i believe. That has to help. 2. It good be they got better grades in school. Not sure but def makes a difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Topics: 13
Replies: 73
Post: #44718
PT: #3/3
|
Two things are involved here; the contacts the coach has and the players grades.
Academy will definitely be picking up steam, quite a few kids recruited from academies already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |