11RoCks |
January 14th, 2012 20:23 GMT |

|
|
Topics: 32
Replies: 263
Post: #49372
PT: #1/65
|
99G tied at half with Az 1-1
|
"Success is no accident. It is hard work, perseverance, learning, studying, sacrifice and most of all, love of what you are doing or learning to do." Pele
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
11RoCks |
January 18th, 2012 01:51 GMT |

|
|
Topics: 32
Replies: 263
Post: #49463
PT: #2/65
|
Congrats to 99G for going undefeated in the AZ National ODP Championships!
|
"Success is no accident. It is hard work, perseverance, learning, studying, sacrifice and most of all, love of what you are doing or learning to do." Pele
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Topics: 30
Replies: 1241
Post: #49497
PT: #3/65
|
Congrats to the 2012 Region IV ODP Champions:
95G - CS
96G - CS
97G - CS
98G - WA
99G - AZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Topics: 1
Replies: 17
Post: #49609
PT: #4/65
|
Any news on when they will post the all-tourney teams for girls?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Topics: 30
Replies: 1241
Post: #49645
PT: #5/65
|
Last year, the boys team was posted within a day of the finals, while the girls team took a few weeks. Don't hold your breath hoping to see many CN players on the first team. IMO, there's a bias toward CS in regional ODP. Usually doesn't bother me because CS usually wins the age-group, but did bother me last year when they lost in the 96G semis and still got the most selections to that age-group's All-Star team. This year, it'll be interesting to see how they handle the 99G age group where CS didn't compete, having chosen to play the CS 99G team in the 98G age group (where they got to the semis).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Topics: 1
Replies: 17
Post: #49646
PT: #6/65
|
Thank you! I was curious. I do recgonize the bias for CS, year after year, it still seems the same. Please don't get me wrong, they have talented atheletes, but some other talents have gone unrecgonized and that is unfortunate. As for this year, in the 98G group, it looked as they had placed the stronger teams on one side of the bracket, so even though the CS 99G team went to the semis, they were not playing the strogest teams of the 98G group during pool play. I would imagine those girls would still go under the 99 umbrella when they do select the all-tourney team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Blues99 |
January 27th, 2012 06:41 GMT |

|
|
Topics: 16
Replies: 602
Post: #49649
PT: #7/65
|
US Youth Soccer is holding a national development camp for the 95s, 96s, and 97s and all together over 190 girls were invited to this camp, and only 4 are from Cal North. If that is not bias than I'm not sure what it is. I'm happy to say that three of these girls are from Blues/Placer's u15 team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Topics: 0
Replies: 516
Post: #49651
PT: #9/65
|
No bias to CS they are better. Same old norcal results. third tier program at best
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Blues99 |
January 27th, 2012 19:20 GMT |

|
|
Topics: 16
Replies: 602
Post: #49652
PT: #10/65
|
Quoted from: Toneib, January 27th, 2012 15:35 GMTQuoted from: Blues99, January 27th, 2012 06:41 GMTUS Youth Soccer is holding a national development camp for the 95s, 96s, and 97s and all together over 190 girls were invited to this camp, and only 4 are from Cal North. If that is not bias than I'm not sure what it is. I'm happy to say that three of these girls are from Blues/Placer's u15 team.
Here is the link to the invitees. Low Cal North numbers are possibly due to ECNL and US Club PDP involvement.
No doubt that ECNL has had a significant impact on the numbers, but I do know that on the 97s team there is a least one player from each Mustang, Rage, and DeAnza's ECNL teams.
Cal South is very strong. Not only do they have great players, but my understanding is that their rosters from year to year don't change much so they are used to playing with each other. They also practice together throughout the year and it shows at tournaments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |